Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/archaeologicalsu03egyp n /76 k EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND. IprestDent. SIR JOHN FOWLER, Bart., K.C.M.G. Wcesffiresioents. Sir Charles Newton, K.C.B., D.C.L. R. Stuart Poole, Esq., LL.T). {Ron. Sec). E. Maunde Thompson, Esq., C.B., D.C.L., LL.D. Charles Dudley Warner, Esq.,L.H.D., LL.D. (U.S.A.). The Rev. W. C. Winslow, D.D., D.C.L. (Hon. Treats, and Hon. Sec, U.S.A.). The Hon. Edward G. Mason (U.S.A.). The Hon. John Geo. Bourinot, D.C.L (Canada). Prof. G. Maspero, D.C.L. (France). Josiah Mullens, Esq. (Australia). M. Charles Hentsch (Switzerland). 1bon. treasurers. H. A, Grueber, Esq., F.S.A. The Rev. W. C. Winslow, D.D., D.C.L. (Boston, U.S.A.). Clarence H. Clark, Esq. (Penn. U.S.A.). 1foon. Secretary. R. Stuart Poole, Esq., LL.D. Members of The Rt. Hon. Lord Amherst ofHackney.F.S.A. T. H. Baylis, Esq., M.A., Q.C. Miss Bradbury. J. S. Cotton, Esq., M.A. M. J. de Morgan (Birecteur General des Anti- quites de Vfigypte). Sir John Evans, K.C.B., D.C.L., LL.D. W. Fowler, Esq. Major - General Sir Francis Grenfell, G.C.M.G., K.C.B. F. L. Griffith, Esq., B.A., F.S.A. T. Farmer Hall, Esq. Pbof. T. Hayter Lewis, F.S.A. Mrs. McClure. Committee. The Rev. W. MacGregor, M.A. Prof. J. H. Middleton, M.A., Litt.D., D.C.L. A. S. Murray, Esq., LL.D., F.S.A. D. Parrish, Esq. (U.S.A.). Francis Wm. Percival, Esq. Lieut.-Col. J. C. Ross, R.E., C.M.G. The Rev. Prof. A. H. Sayoe, M.A., LL.D. H. Villiers Stuart, Esq. Mrs. Tirard. The Rev. H. G. Tomkins, M.A. The Rt. Rev. The Lord Bishop of Truro. Hermann Weber, Esq., M.D. Major-General Sir Charles Wilson, K.C.B., K.C.M.G., F.R.S. CONTENTS. Peepaoe .... I. Introduction — 1. General description of the tomb of Tehutihetep . 2. Previous work at the tomb .... 3. The nomarch Tehutihetep and his family . II. Detailed Description op the Tomb, and Explanation op the Scenes and Inscriptions — 1. Architectural features 2. System of decoration 3. Facade, &c. 4. Outer chamber . Ceiling Right and left-hand walls Inner wall . 5. Inner chamber . Outer wall . Left-hand wall Inner wall . Right-hand wall . 6. Shrine .... Inner wall . Right and left-hand walls Index List op Plates (with references to the pages on which they are described) ....... PAGE vii 1-3 3-5 6-8 PLATE 9-10 IL-IV 10-11 12-13 V 13-15 > VI.-IX 13 VI 13 VII 14-15 VIIL-IX 15-38 X.-XXXI 15-16 X.-XI. 16-30 XII.-XIX. 30-32 XX.-XXIII. 32-38 XXIV.-XXXI. 39-40 XXXII.-XXXIV. 39 XXXIII. 39-40 XXXIL, XXXIV. 41 44 PEEFACE. The Survey of the Middle Kingdom tombs in the Gebel el Bersheh was made during the winter 1891-2. The party, consisting of Messrs. P. E. Newberry, G. W. Fraser, and Howard Carter, arrived at El Bersheh on the 24th November, 1891, and in the middle of December was joined by Mr. M. W. Blackden, who kindly volunteered his services in order to make coloured copies of the wall-paintings in the tombs, and gave much assistance in superintending the clearance of the debris, &c, which had accumulated in them. The work of tracing in outline the wall-paintings and inscriptions was finished on the 2nd January, 1892, when Mr. Newberry returned to England. Mr. Carter also left to join Prof. Petrie in his work at Tell el Amarna. The Survey of the hill and tombs was completed by Messrs. Fraser and Blackden in February, 1892. In May, 1893, Mr. Howard Carter again went to El Bersheh, and stayed there till the end of June, making water- colour drawings of the most interesting scenes and of hieroglyphic signs in the tomb of Tehutihetep, and completing the tracings. In all, there are ten inscribed tombs of the Middle Kingdom at El Bersheh. Of these, the tomb of Tehutihetep (the second from the north-west), published in the present volume, is by far the finest and most interesting. The remaining nine inscribed tombs and a Survey of the Gebel el Bersheh, together with the general account of the group, will be published in El Bersheh, Part II. The plan, elevation, and sections, and the details of the doorways and columns, are published from drawings made on the spot by Mr. G. W. Fraser. PREFACE. Vlll The coloured frontispiece is from an excellent facsimile made by Mr. Blackden. The plates are the work of Mr. Carter and Mr. Newberry. Those numbered v, vi„ xiv., x.vi., xxiv., xxvii.-xxxi., are wholly or in part the work of Mr. Newberry, all the remaining plates are by Mr. Carter. Mr. Newberry is also, of course, responsible for the copies of inscriptions. The letter-press, as in the second volume of Beni Hasan, is the joint production of Mr. Griffith and Mr. Newberry. EL BEESHEH. :p.a_:r,t i. The Tomb op ^ _ Tehutihetep, % v-y o D ^T- " GEEAT OhIEP OP THE HAEE NOME." I. INTRODUCTION. 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TOMB OF TEHUTI-HETEP. Like most of the magnates who were buried around him, Tehutihetep l ( & ^^)» tne n°ble occupant of the second tomb, was prince of the nome of Hermopolis. His capital was the ancient - - $L Khemenu, now marked by the mounds of Eshmimen,2 and it is probable that there was his residence. The city lay in the middle of the valley, and at some distance from the west bank of the Nile ; the nearest point of the hills is about five miles due east, near the site of the Roman city of Antinoe, but for some reason the princes of the Middle In the Early and Middle Kingdoms the name of Thoth was written \\ Zehuti, the "1 * changing first to <-=-a d, and then to a t in the course of time. Tehnti being more familiar than Zehuti, we think it will be convenient to use the later form Tehutihetep in the place of Zehuti- hetep, although the latter would be more strictly consistent with our system of transliteration. 2 See map of the neighbourhood of El Bersheh, El Bersheh, Part II, fig. 1. Kingdom, in choosing a site for their necropolis, went further south, and selected the north side of a rocky valley in the hills behind the modern Der en Nakhleh, " the convent of the date-palm." The group of tombs is known to Egyptologists by the name of El Bersheh, the hills being called Gebel el Bersheh by the natives ; El Bersheh is also the name of a village and of a der, or monastery, near by. That part of the Gebel or hill of El Bersheh in which the tombs of the Middle Kingdom nomarchs are situated is about five miles south of Antinoe, and seven miles from Eshmimen in a direct line across the Nile. The tomb of Tehutihetep is the most con- spicuous of all that exist at El Bersheh, and was probably the finest tomb ever excavated there. Unfortunately, it has been much shattered by an earthquake, which apparently took place many centuries ago, causing the limestone strata to slip irregularly one over another along their south-west dip, so that the roof of the tomb has been projected for- ward about a foot, and the ceiling of the outer chamber has entirely collapsed, bringing EL BERSHEH. down with it the architrave and columns of the portico. To reach the tomb from the river it is best to land opposite Raramun and walk across the cultivated land, through the Coptic village of Der en Nakhleh, to the edge of the desert. A Coptic cemetery lies at the foot of the hills. Up the slope, due east of Der en Nakhleh, can be discerned a road or dromos, marked out on either side by large boulders. It ascends the hill to the summit, and near the top passes the terrace, on to which all the larger tombs of the Middle Kingdom open. The tomb described in the present volume is the second inscribed one on the south side of the great roadway, and is marked No. 2 on the Survey to be published in El Bersheh, Part II., PL 3. It consists of a portico, a main chamber, and a shrine, and like all the other tombs in the group it is excavated in the hill-side. The facade, before its collapse, must have presented an imposing architectural front. It consisted of two noble columns with palm-leaf capitals supporting a massive architrave, all coloured pink and marbled with pale-green to represent rose-granite ; at the sides were seen the names of the kings under whom Tehuti- hetep, the owner of the tomb, had served. The space behind the columns was so large that we have called it an outer chamber. The walls were sculptured with scenes of hunting large game with nets, of fowling with the throw-stick, and of fishing with spear or harpoon. The left-hand wall (now wholly destroyed) was pro- bably devoted to military and wrestling scenes, such as we see so often in the tombs of the same period at Beni Hasan. The ceiling was painted blue and studded with yellow quatre- foils ; the design evidently represents a starred canopy supported by a transverse rafter, the latter being also imitated in the painting. A narrow doorway, the jambs of which were inscribed, led from this chamber into another rectangular hall-the main or inner chamber— measuring about twenty-five feet from front to back, by twenty feet in breadth, and thirteen feet six inches in height. The walls of this chamber were also covered with sculpture and painting above a plain black dado. On the front wall at either side of the door we have curious scenes of purification. On the upper part of the left-hand wall is the celebrated painting of the "Colossus on a sledge," a huge alabaster statue of Tehutihetep being dragged by nearly two hundred men ; on the lower part of the same wall are scenes of boats on the Nile, and cattle, the whole referring to a great stock-taking, to which the herdsmen of the nome brought in their annual tribute of cattle. On the inner wall we see Tehutihetep netting wild fowl with his wife and son, watching fishermen hauling a net to shore, and receiving birds, fish, &c, from his estate. The greater part of the right-hand wall fell with the earthquake, and was smashed into fragments ; from the portion still in place and the fragments recovered from the debris, we gather that the scenes depicted the owner's household and the occupations of his farm servants, gardeners, &c. The ceiling of this chamber is decorated like that of the portico, but with the support- ing beam represented as placed longitudi- nally, and in the centre is a rectangular space of a different pattern, crossed by the beam and bordered by a black line. This space is filled with a black and yellow check pattern. At the inner end three low steps lead into a small shrine about four feet broad by eight feet deep and eight feet high. It is remarkable that it contained no statues like those at Beni Hasan and elsewhere. On each of the side walls is painted a scene of offerings, sur- mounted by the Tchelcer ornament. Instead of statues there are two figures in low relief on the inner wall, of equal height, and facing one another, representing Tehutihetep and his PREVIOUS WORK AT THE TOMB. father Kay.1 Tehutihetep generally calls him- self " son of Kay " in his inscriptions, but none of the scenes in the larger chambers of the tomb refer to Kay. The age of the tomb is clearly indicated by the cartouches engraved on the outer corners of the facade, according to which Tehutihetep lived in the reigns of Amenemhat II., Usertsen II., and Usertsen III., so that it was probably in the long reign of the last-named king that this tomb was completed and the nomarch died. It is interesting to find amongst the sculptures the names of the principal workmen employed upon the excavation and adornment of this masterpiece of Middle Kingdom workmanship. The " director of the work " was a J jg j ^, □ © " Ab-Kau's son Sep," and the artist employed to decorate it (j c~~i (j ■£ ATVX %\ "Amena-ankhu." These men's handiwork was well worthy to carry down their fame to posterity. 2. PREVIOUS WORK AT THE TOMB. The group of tombs at El Bersheh was quite unknown to the members of the great French expedition under Napoleon, as well as to their predecessors. Its discovery, how- ever, dates back to 1817, and we owe the first account of it to two naval officers, Captain Mangles and Lieutenant Irby.2 These two travellers, after a voyage up the Nile to the first cataract, joined an expedition consisting of Messrs. Bankes, Beechey, and Belzoni, who were about to proceed into Nubia in order to effect an entrance through the sand-drifts into the great temple at Abu Simbel. At that date travellers in Nubia were beset with many 1 Pronounced Ka-y. 2 Travels in Egypt, Nubia, Syria and Asia Minor during the years 1817-1818, by the Hon. C. L. Irby and S. Mangles, London, 1823. difficulties, owing to the mutual jealousies of the local governors and the disorganized state of the country. Labourers could hardly be obtained, and it was chiefly by their own exertions that these travellers, half-starved as they were by the refusal of the people to supply them with food, at length excavated the door- way of the great temple ; and for the first time for many centuries man set foot within its brilliantly decorated halls. Those who had hoped to find portable treasures within were doubtless disappointed, but our travellers sought adventure and discovery. On their homeward voyage they broke their journey at several points where they heard of the exis- tence of important remains. At El Kab they admired the tomb of Paheri.3 On the 26th of August, 1817, they reached Raramun, and guided presumably by Mr. Brine, the English founder of the sugar factory there, they dis- covered the tomb of Tehutihetep, and were much struck by the interesting character of its paintings.4 Messrs. Bankes and Beechey revisited it at an early opportunity and made drawings, which probably exist to this day, but have not yet been traced to their present owners. A copy of Mr. Bankes' outline of the colossus has, however, been seen by us amongst 3 Published in the Xlth Memoir of the Egypt Exploration Fund. 4 " Before we leave Egypt I should inform you that we discovered an interesting tomb opposite Mr. Brine's, at Kadimore [Karamun]. The sides were covered with paint- ings, among which are two groups, of a description very rarely, if ever, to be met with ; one of them represents the removal of a colossus between thirty and forty feet high, and seated on a chair ; upwards of a hundred labourers are employed. The other drawing represents an Egyptian garden, with exotics in flower-pots, arranged on a terrace, near which is an arbour, bee-hives, &c. Mr. Bankes and Mr. Beechey are the only travellers who have visited this tomb since we discovered it : the former has accurate draw- ings of all its contents." — Irby and Mangles, Travels, London, 1821, p. 165. The reference to bee-hives is due to some misconception, as there is no sign of such amongst the paintings here or in any other tomb at present known in Egypt. B 2 EL BEESHBH. Sir Gardner Wilkinson's papers.1 From this it would appear that not much attention was paid to detail, so that the drawings would not be of much importance for scenes of which other records exist. Many of the great groups of tombs in Egypt are situated in conspicuous places. That of El Bersheh is not so easy to find ; hence it is seldom mentioned in books of travel and antiquarian research. Neither Caillaud, nor Wilkinson in his early publications, nor Burton, nor Champollion, has left any independent record of it. Rosellini, however, the head of the Tuscan expedition and a companion of Champollion in most of his journey, published the scene of the colossus on a sledge in 1832,2 from a drawing by Dr. Eicci, one of his col- leagues; but it is certain that Champollion never saw it. In 1833 Bono mi and Arundale were sent by Robert Hay of Linplum, then living in Egypt, to make a plan and drawings of the tomb of the colossus, and the following unpublished letter from Bonomi to Hay, referring to this visit, is preserved amongst the Hay manuscripts in the British Museum.3 " Raramoun, July 2St/i, 1833. "My dear Sir, " We arrived here on the morning of the 26th, and after visiting Sig. Antonini,4 went in search of the tomb, which we easily found, but in a very different state to what it was when I saw it before,5 holes having been picked in the walls, and a considerable part of the rest nearly obliterated by the rain getting in ; however, by dint of scraping and sponging we have succeeded in getting the principal part of the subject of greatest interest Mr. Arundale has made a plan and sections, in which will be seen the situation of the subjects. " Yours, etc., " J. Bonomi." The drawings mentioned in this letter are still preserved.6 They comprise a plan and a longitudinal section of the tomb by Arundale,7 the latter showing the disposition of the scenes ; pencil drawings to a very small scale of the inner walls of both the inner and outer chambers;8 a copy of the inscription behind the colossus scene;9 the colossus itself, partly in colour;10 and the doorway of the building towards which the statue was being dragged.11 Five years later, in December, 1838, Nestor de l'Hote gave, in one of his letters,12 a brief description of the tomb, and probably copied several of the scenes, but unfortunately the greater part of his drawings and squeezes were lost at sea. In 1841, however, he again visited Egypt and the tombs at El Bersheh. He then made a number of useful notes upon this tomb, which are preserved among his manuscripts in the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris.13 1 Apparently a lithograph of this drawing was circulated by Mr. Bankes ; it was utilised by Sir Gardner Wilkinson in his Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians, 1837, p. 328, as well as in the later edition, and in the com- mentary to Rawlinson's translation of Herodotus. 2 Rosellini, I Monumenti delV Egitto e delta Nubia, Mon. Civili, torn, ii., tav. xlviii. 1 ; text, torn, ii., p. 246. 3 Add. MS. 29,859, fol. 30. 4 The successor of Mr. Brine, who is referred to above, p. 3. 5 Bonomi had lived in Egypt since 1824. 6 Add. MS. 29,814. ' Ibid., fol. 3 and 4 ; our pi. ii. 8 Ibid., fol. 5 ; our pis. viii., ix., and xx. 9 Ibid., fol. 7 ; our pi. xiv. l0 Ibid., fol. 8 ; our pi. xv. 11 Ibid., fol. 6 ; our pi. xvi. 12 Lettres ecrites de I'Egypfe, p. 46-50. On p. 47 is an extract from the inscription with titles of Tehutihetep from the thickness of the wall printed on p. 15 of our memoir, and the names of his sons, Usertsen-ankh and Nehera, from the since-destroyed upper left-hand corner, in our pi. x. ; and on p. 48 Tehutihetep fowling with the throw-stick, accompanied by his three sons (our pi. viii.). The legends accompanying the sons in this scene have also recently been cut away, no doubt in order to obtain the cartouche. 13 Papiers de Nestor de VHdte, tomes iii. and xi. (copied by the editor in 1888). Vol. iii., fols. 246-267, gives a brief but orderly descrip- tion of the tomb, with slight extracts from the subjects. Fols. 246-7, the shrine, especially the inscriptions on the back wall (our pi. xxxiii.). In the succeeding folios are notes of the main chamber, including on fol. 250 the inscription on the ceiling (our pi. vi.). Fol. 248, the right-hand side of the inner wall (our pi. xx.). Fol. 249, inscriptions on the right-hand jamb of the portico (oar PREVIOUS WORK AT THE TOMB. In 1837 Wilkinson published a drawing of the colossus on a sledge in his Manners and Customs of the Ancient Egyptians,1 the source of which was Mr. Bankes' lithograph. He had searched for the tomb, but had failed to find it,2 and it was not until 1841 that he arrived at the spot. Some valuable sketches made on this occasion are preserved among his papers at Oalke Abbey, Derbyshire, and copies of them were made last year for our use.3 The Prussian expedition under Lepsius visited the tomb in July, 1843,4 and several subjects were selected for copying, including, of course, the colossus on a sledge.5 pi. v.). Fol. 253, inscriptions on the doorway to the temple (our pi. xvi.). Fol. 254, the long inscription behind the colossus (our pi. xiv.), together with part of the large figure of Tehutihetep following, and the remains of the line of inscription containing his titles (see p. 17). Fol. 255, the scene of purification, with the inscriptions (our pi. x.). Fols. 264-267, description of the tomb, with notes of the inscriptions, including a slight sketch to show the restora- tion of the plan : strange to say, although he states that no trace remains of the columns, he recognizes that they must have existed : the inscription on the thickness of the wall (see p. 15), and the names of the sons from the scene of spearing fish (our pi. ix.), now partly destroyed, are also given. Vol. xi., p. 25, scene of the colossus, with inscriptions. 1 Vol. iii., p. 328 ; a second edition in 1847. 2 Modem Egypt and Thebes, vol. ii., pp. 64, 65. 3 These drawings of Wilkinson are bound up with other large ones, chiefly of a very early date, but with some later ones inserted, and the volume is labelled " Egyptian Sculpture." Between fols. 2 and 3 are a number of added leaves, the first (a) with the scene of dragging the colossus (coloured), and some of the inscriptions on the back. On the second leaf (b) is a coloured copy of the portion of the right-hand wall still standing, including the gardening scene, &c, in our pis. xxv.-xxvi., but without the top row. On the third leaf (c) are some fragments of inscriptions from the same tomb, and on the fourth (d) the inscriptions of the colossus scene (our pi. xv.). 4 Lepsius' Letters from Egypt, No. 15. 5 Published in the Denkmdler, Abth. ii., Bl. 134, 135. Bl. 134, drawn by E. Weidenbach. (a) Scene of the colossus on a sledge, without the short inscriptions, but with the long inscription behind it. (b) Tehutihetep seated in the seh, our pi. xix. (c) The inscriptions on the back wall of the shrine, our pi. xxxiii. (d) The large standing figure of Tehutihetep, in our pi. xx. ; and (e) Another of the same Since Sir Gardner Wilkinson's visit in 1850 hardly anything appears to have been done in the way of preserving the inscriptions.6 There is, however, one exception. Major Brown, of the Egyptian Irrigation Department, took a photograph of the scene of the colossus on a sledge in 1889. Of this one print was taken, which Major Brown kindly gave us, but the negative itself is lost.7 Then came the destroyer. The year after Major Brown took his photograph, the im- portant inscription behind the colossus was cut away, and many other parts of the tomb were wantonly injured. Thus the scenes which decorated its walls for so many cen- turies, and withstood the shock of the earth- quake, had just undergone the most grievous mutilation, when, in November 1891, our survey party reached Bl Bersheh. The expedition sent hither to rescue some of the most important records of ancient Egypt from oblivion was just too late to effect much of what was pur- posed, yet not too late to save a great deal that was valuable from its impending fate. Fortunately, the copies of Lepsius, Hay, Nestor de l'Hote, and Wilkinson, enable us to restore much of what has been recently destroyed, and the present volume will show that a goodly harvest has been gathered from this tomb. from the hunting scene, our pi. vii. b, d, and e were selected no doubt to illustrate the costume. Bl. 135, drawn by'Eirund. (a, b, c, d) Inscription on the "gateway" on the west wall, our pi. xvi. (e) Part of the title of Kay from the right-hand wall of the shrine, our pi. xxxiv. (/) The inscription belonging to the figure of Nub-unut from the back wall of the inner chamber, our pi. xx. (g) The inscription with royal names, from the right- hand jamb of the portico, our pi. v. 6 We are pleased to hear from Dr. Spiegelberg that some copies probably exist at Strassburg among the papers of the indefatigable Professor Diimichen, whose recent loss we so much deplore. 1 The print has been re-photographed, in order to preserve the record, and copies can be obtained on application to the Secretary, Egypt Exploration Fund. EL BERSHEH. 3. THE NOMARCH TEHUTIHBTEP AND HIS FAMILY. As is so often the case with Egyptian tombs, the inscriptions in that of Tehutihetep throw but little light upon the owner's life and descent. Regarding the earlier history of his family, a good deal of information can be gleaned from inscriptions in other tombs at El Bersheh,1 and from the valuable collection of hieratic records recently copied in the quarries of Het-nub and published by Messrs. Blackden and Fraser;2 but, as Tehutihetep himself is not referred to in any of them, it will be best to defer the con- sideration of this part of the subject until the inscriptions of the other tombs are published. For the present therefore we shall confine ourselves to those facts regarding Tehutihetep and his parentage and family that are recorded in the inscriptions of his own tomb. On the jambs of the facade were four in- scriptions, which were intended to give in a very succinct form the main landmarks in Tehutihetep's life ; unfortunately, they are badly mutilated. The first tells that the prince Tehutihetep had been "a child of the king," under Amenemhat II. At Beni Hasan, likewise, Khnemhetep had been " a child of the king, of his briuging up,"3 and this shows what the meaning of the phrase is here, namely, that Tehutihetep had been educated in the palace with the royal children of Amenemhat II. Next, two of the inscriptions refer to Usertsen II., who reigned nineteen years. In one we find that Tehutihetep held the high position of " sole royal friend " under this king ; on the other only the royal name is recognisable, but the inscription must have recorded some ad- vancement. It is impossible to decide which of these two inscriptions took the second or the 1 To be published in El Bersheh, Part II. 2 Collection of Hieratic Graffiti from the Alabaster Quarry of Hat-Nub (London, Luzac). 3 Compare Beni Hasan, Part I, pi. xxxii., and Part II., p. 10. third place in point of time. Lastly, the fourth inscription names Usertsen III.; but the indica- tion of Tehutihetep's rank at this time is again destroyed. "We may fairly believe that it was in the course of this long reign of over thirty years that Tehutihetep died and was buried, having seen the rule of three kings; but he may have survived into the reign of Amenem- hat III.4 This is all that we possess of the chronology of Tehutihetep's life. His titles are very fully recorded elsewhere in the tomb. Most of them are to be found on pi. xvi. The civil ones are: — 1. Er-pd, " .EVya-prince." 2. Ha, " ffa-prince." 3. Sahu bdti, "Treasurer of the King of Lower Egypt." 4. Semer udti, " Confidential friend of the King." 5. Bekh seten, " Royal acquaintance." 6. her tep da en Unt, " Great Chief of the Hare nome." 7. a set neb, " Gate of every foreign country." 8. Sab-ad-mer Bep , " of Buto." 9. her tep dat Mentet, " Chief of high offices." 10. her tep NeMeb, " Chief of the city of Nekheb." 11. dri Nekhen, " He who belongs to the city of Nekhen." 12. khu ne dm aha, " Comptroller of what is in the palace" (?). The most remarkable of these are No. 6, the title of the nomarch of the Hare nome, and No. 7, which perhaps means that Tehuti- hetep had the right to give passports over all the frontiers of Egypt. Those numbered 1-5 and 8-11 were commonly held by the great men of the period. The religious titles were very numerous; they are : — 1. mer henu neter, " Superintendent of the priests." 2. JJr dua em per Zehuti, " Great of five in the temple of Tehuti." (With variant hut for per on p. 16.) 4 The united reigns of Amenemhat II., Usertesen II., and Usertesen III., would amount to about seventy-five years, allowing for co-regency. THE NOMAECH TEHUTIHETEP AND HIS FAMILY. 3. Merp nesti, "Regulator of the two thrones.". 4. her [se]-sheta ne reu pern, " Set over the mysteries of the temples." 5. her [se~\sheta ne neter em est zesert, " Set over the mysteries of the god in sacred places." 6. her se-sheta ne medu neter, "Set over the mysteries of the divine formulse." 7. her se-sheta ne Met neter, "Set over the mysteries of the divine secrets." 8. Merp hetep neter, " Manager of the divine offerings." 9. Mer heb her tep, " Chief lector." 10. sem Merp shenzet nebt, " $em-master of all the tunics." 11. SeMem neteru, "Who influences the gods." 12. Merp hut net Net, "Regulator of the temples of Net." " 13. hen neter Maat, " Priest of Maat." By far the most interesting of these are the two numbered 2 and 3, which are the titles of the high priest of Thoth at Hermopolis.1 Some of those numbered 4-7 are not uncommon ; but as held by the high priest of Thoth, the god of wisdom, the scribe and recorder of the gods, they have a special significance. The rest of the titles are such as were often borne by the heads of great families. Of the events of Tehutihetep's life, or of his personal character, we know scarcely any- thing. The scenes in the tomb are mostly of the ordinary type of the period. All the nomarchs were devoted to hunting, fishing, and fowling, and took delight in the excellence of their gardens and farm-yards. The quality of the sculpture and the loving detail in the gardening and other scenes indicate, perhaps, some special characteristics of Tehutihetep, and the great scene of the conveyance of the colossus is probably a record of an act un- rivalled by any of his contemporaries. As to Tehutihetep's family, his paternal grandfather ® l] Nehera is named once/ 1 Compare Brugsch's Diet. Geogr., 1361. 2 Vide pi. xxxiv., and cf. p. 39. and the inscriptions on the inner wall of the shrine, in recording that Tehutihetep succeeded to the princedom held by his paternal grand- father, imply that he was Great Chief of the Hare nome. We shall have more to say about Nehera in the second part of this memoir. The names of \J I (jA Kay,3 Tehutihetep's father, and ^^° ^ U* Sat-kheper-ka, his mother, are several times found in the inscrip- tions, but only the chief titles of the former are recorded. He was " /^-prince of the city of the pyramid called Jcha of Usertsen,"5 and a 3 Vide pis. vi., x., xvi., &c. 4 Vide pis. v., vi., &c. The name is also written ^JSU pis. vi., viii., &c 5 As there were three Usertsens in this dynasty, and as the names of their respective pyramids, with one exception, are either uncertain or unknown, it is necessary to consider to which of them this pyramid kha belonged. It has hitherto been attributed to Usertsen II., apparently on the sole ground that, while it occurred in the tomb of Tehutihetep, his was the latest cartouche known from thence. But our clearance of the facade revealed the name of his successor, Usertsen III. ; so that the argument as it stood can no longer be sustained. Yet it is not very likely that the pyramid was that of Usertsen III., since the father of Tehutihetep, if he yet lived, probably reached a patriarchal age early in the reign of that king. The only other evidence with regard to the names of the pyramids referred to comes from Prof. Flinders Petrie's discoveries at Kahun. It will be recollected that the town of Kahun was built in connection with the pyramid of Usertsen II., commonly known as the Illahun pyramid, and that on its site were found numerous papyri and seals from other documents now destroyed. Several of the seals name princes of the city of the pyramid called Hetep- Usertsen (vide Prof. Petrie's Kahun, Hawara, and Gurob, pi. x., Nbs. 21-24). The same locality is also frequently named in the papyri, and it cannot be questioned that this was the name of the pyramid city of Usertsen II. Can, then, the pyramid of Usertsen II. have had two names, hetep and khal In one or two papyri from Kahun the hetep of Usertsen and the kha of Usertsen are mentioned together ; it is thus just possible that they are the names of two localities connected with the same pyramid. Lastly, we know nothing about the name of the pyramid of Usertsen I. The identification of the £7ia-pyramid is therefore a matter of extreme uncertainty. EL BBKSHEH. "superintendent of the priests."1 So far as we can tell, bis exalted office took him away from the Hare nome, so that he did not hold the princedom which his father Nehera had held. We may suppose, also, that his tomb was not at El Bersheh, but perhaps at the royal city of Memphis; and it is probable that for this reason Tehutihetep commemorated him, together with himself, in the shrine of his own tomb as with a cenotaph. Of the titles and parentage of Sat-kheper-ka nothing is known, the inscription (over her portrait on the right- hand wall),2 which may have recorded them, being lost. The name of Tehutihetep' s wife Hathor-hetep occurs three times, parentage is not given. She was a hen-neter Eether, " priestess of Hathor," and a nebt per, "lady of the house." Next to her, in the scene representing the female relatives of Tehutihetep on the right-hand wall, are two smaller figures of women, who may have been Nehera = (Great Chief of the Hare nome) but ^ D her his concubines, the title "p ^ ^ anMeL which is preserved with one of them, being of un- certain meaning.3 His children were eight in number — three sons and five daughters. Of the sons ^ % lbs. S ^*L&- Shemsu-em-khau-ef was the eldest; his portrait is given several times in the wall-paintings. The two younger ones were named (1 P T H] "f IT Usertsen-ankh and ~